Between Logic and Common Sense: The Formal Semantics of Words

نویسنده

  • Yoad Winter
چکیده

One of the most important properties of human languages is their ability to convey intricate meanings. The vastness and effectiveness of those meanings for everyday communication and reasoning transcends all known non-human languages, including other animal languages and artificial languages. For studying communication and reasoning in language, an indispensable empirical concept is entailment: the relation between premises and valid conclusions expressed as natural language sentences. Entailment relations may appear between sentences due to the presence of words and expressions like other, either...or, not or exactly five, whose meanings have been studied in logical frameworks since antiquity. However, entailments may also appear due to semantic properties of “non-logical” words like parrot, hug, far or knowledge. Such content words constitute the bulk of the lexicon in all natural languages. Without considering them, it is simply impossible to understand entailment phenomena and human reasoning in general. However, while content words have played an important role in cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence, their meanings have turned out to be richer and fuzzier than what current logical techniques in semantics can handle. As a result, the study of entailment has lagged behind important advances of other areas in the study of language. This program will develop a comprehensive model of entailment in language. A new framework of Content Sensitive Formal Semantics will treat the interactions between common sense meanings of content words (e.g. parrot) and logical operators in language (e.g. not). The resulting model of entailment is expected to constitute a breakthrough in our understanding of linguistic reasoning and its practical applications.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

?Logic and Formal Ontology: Is the Final Formal Ontology Possible

Musa Akrami AbstractMany philosophers and logicians have contemplated the relationship between ontology and logic. The author of this paper, working within a Bolzanoan-Husserlian tradition of studying both ontology and logic, considers ontology as the science of the most general features of beings and the most general relations among them. He considers logic as the science concernin...

متن کامل

Application of Frame Semantics to Teaching Seeing and Hearing Vocabulary to Iranian EFL Learners

A term in one language rarely has an absolute synonymous meaning in the same language; besides, it rarely has an equivalent meaning in an L2. English synonyms of seeing and hearing are particularly grammatically and semantically different. Frame semantics is a good tool for discovering differences between synonymous words in L2 and differences between supposed L1 and L2 equivalents. Vocabulary ...

متن کامل

A short introduction to two approaches in formal verification of security protocols: model checking and theorem proving

In this paper, we shortly review two formal approaches in verification of security protocols; model checking and theorem proving. Model checking is based on studying the behavior of protocols via generating all different behaviors of a protocol and checking whether the desired goals are satisfied in all instances or not. We investigate Scyther operational semantics as n example of this...

متن کامل

Anaphora resolution and reambiguation∗

Starting off from common assumptions on the relationship between ambiguity and the process of disambiguation with regard to the technique of underspecification, we argue that disambiugation may be viewed as non-monotonic in nature in certain cases involving anaphora resolution. We then go on to present a formal analysis framed in a coupling of Discourse Representation Theory and Constraint Logi...

متن کامل

Interpreting Common Words in Context: a Symbolic Approach

This paper presents a lexical model dedicated to the semantic representation and interpretation of individual words in unrestricted text, where sense discrimination is difficult to assess. We discuss the need of a lexicon including local inference mechanisms and cooperating with as many other knowledge sources (about syntax, semantics and pragmatics) as possible. We suggest a minimalist represe...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010